<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;rock&#8221; verses &#8220;rocks&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks/comment-page-1#comment-6988</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks#comment-6988</guid>
		<description>If you find something logical out, let me know, as far as I am concerned it is just an arbitrary rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you find something logical out, let me know, as far as I am concerned it is just an arbitrary rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mithro</title>
		<link>http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks/comment-page-1#comment-6987</link>
		<dc:creator>mithro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks#comment-6987</guid>
		<description>Why does he/she/it add an &#039;s&#039; on the end of the word, while I and you don&#039;t? What logical reason is there for it (as it obviously has nothing to do with pluralization. Normally we add &quot;s&quot; (or &quot;es&quot;) to pluralize a noun, there must be more going on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does he/she/it add an &#8217;s&#8217; on the end of the word, while I and you don&#8217;t? What logical reason is there for it (as it obviously has nothing to do with pluralization. Normally we add &#8220;s&#8221; (or &#8220;es&#8221;) to pluralize a noun, there must be more going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks/comment-page-1#comment-6986</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks#comment-6986</guid>
		<description>Yeah nothing to explain, that&#039;s just the conjugation of verbs in English.

I jump, you jump, he jumps, she jumps, it jumps, we jump, they jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah nothing to explain, that&#8217;s just the conjugation of verbs in English.</p>
<p>I jump, you jump, he jumps, she jumps, it jumps, we jump, they jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul "TBBle" Hampson</title>
		<link>http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks/comment-page-1#comment-6970</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul "TBBle" Hampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 04:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mithis.net/archives/uncategorized/80-rocks#comment-6970</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it needs explaining per se... That&#039;s just how habitual verbs work. They get an &#039;s&#039; with a singular subject, and no suffix with a plural subject. (In fact, it more likely drops the &#039;s&#039; for a plural subject, but the actual difference is buried somewhere in an exercise book in my cupboard)

He squeegles, she squeegles, we all squeegle for ice cream!

I think the mental dissonance you&#039;re suffering is because rock is also a noun, and you want your singular noun to not have an &#039;s&#039; and your plural noun to have an &#039;s&#039;.

(I have a vauge recollection that there&#039;s another class of English verbs that doesn&#039;t do this, but I can&#039;t for the life of me remember. This vauge recollection is pointing me towards strong VS weak verbs...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it needs explaining per se&#8230; That&#8217;s just how habitual verbs work. They get an &#8217;s&#8217; with a singular subject, and no suffix with a plural subject. (In fact, it more likely drops the &#8217;s&#8217; for a plural subject, but the actual difference is buried somewhere in an exercise book in my cupboard)</p>
<p>He squeegles, she squeegles, we all squeegle for ice cream!</p>
<p>I think the mental dissonance you&#8217;re suffering is because rock is also a noun, and you want your singular noun to not have an &#8217;s&#8217; and your plural noun to have an &#8217;s&#8217;.</p>
<p>(I have a vauge recollection that there&#8217;s another class of English verbs that doesn&#8217;t do this, but I can&#8217;t for the life of me remember. This vauge recollection is pointing me towards strong VS weak verbs&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
